Jinnah House attack case, verdict on PTI founder’s interim bail reserved.

Jinnah House attack case, verdict on PTI founder’s interim bail reserved, to be heard on July 9
I heard my client is going on a hunger strike because he is not getting justice, lawyer founder PTI
It is written in the case that a conspiracy was hatched in a zoom meeting in Zaman Park, answer it, court
There is an allegation of May 7-8 conspiracy, but the prosecution has no evidence, lawyer
Pemra’s testimony and leaders’ speeches on social media are written in the case, court remarks
The Zoom meeting was separated and the Zaman Park meeting was separated and there was a conspiracy in both, prosecution

LAHORE  (  WEB  NEWS )

Anti-Terrorism Court Lahore has reserved its decision on the bails of founder PTI after completing the prosecution arguments in the Jinnah House attack case. The decision will be heard on July 9. Jinnah House attack case was heard against. The lawyer of PTI founder took the position in the court that on May 9, my client was in jail. Whoever committed the crime outside is not responsible for it. PTI founder went to jail on May 9. Bani PTI’s lawyer said, “I heard my client is going on a hunger strike. He is not going on a hunger strike because of more cases, he is going on a hunger strike because of justice.” Not found. The prosecution will have to prove that there is a conspiracy. There is no link of conspiracy on record. The court inquired that it is written in the case that a conspiracy was hatched in a zoom meeting in Zaman Park, answer it. To which the lawyer replied that there is an allegation of the conspiracy of May 7 and May 8, but the prosecution has no evidence. In the cases, there are bail requests, give arguments on them, to which the lawyer replied that it is fine, the government should complete its arguments, I will give more arguments in refutation of what they will say. The prosecution argued that the Zoom meeting was separate and the Zaman Park meeting was separate and there was a conspiracy between them, we have witnesses that the meeting took place on Zaman Park and Zoom. The PTI leader set fire to the 9th of May as part of a conspiracy. At the time of burning and encirclement on May 9, Mian Mehmood-ul-Rashid and other leaders were threatening and inciting the people to make them a lesson. Police constables in plain clothes were present at the party meeting in Zaman Park, the founder himself. They were saying in the PTI meeting that I have an appearance in Islamabad, you have to prepare the workers, if I am arrested, then you have to protest and set fire to the government to create pressure. In the meeting, Dr. Yasmin Rashid, Musrat Jamshed. Cheema, Mian Mehmood-ul-Rashid, Hassan Niazi, Ejaz Chaudhry and others were present. Dr. Yasmin Rashid said in the meeting, “Khan Sahib, don’t worry, if you are arrested, we will teach you a lesson.” Special Prosecutor Rana Abdul Jabbar Khan told the court that if the mob is involved in a crime, then every member of the mob is an accomplice. The speeches made by founder PTI before his arrest are part of the crime, whoever is sitting in Islamabad guiding on the phone is part of the crime, this is the age of communication with modern devices. The Special Prosecutor continued his arguments and said that for example, those who planned the murder and those who assisted and killed them on the motorway were accomplices, the people in Jinnah House and those who were assisting them were all guilty. are Faisal Judge remarked that it is a fact that the accomplice is often not on the spot. The Special Prosecutor said that people on social media are also responsible for the May 9 arson. The court remarked that the special prosecutor is giving an example of murder, to which the special prosecutor replied that an example of murder can be given. happened In the case of Jinnah House, there is an accessory crime and conspiracy plan like Capitol Hill. The court inquired whether Donald Trump was punished in the Capitol Hill case, to which the lawyer of the founder PTI said that the first police chief in this case. Later, the court reserved the case after the arguments of the parties were completed, which will be heard on July 9.

[contact-form][contact-field label=”Name” type=”name” required=”true” /][contact-field label=”Email” type=”email” required=”true” /][contact-field label=”Website” type=”url” /][contact-field label=”Message” type=”textarea” /][/contact-form]